AIDS

AIDS is a serious disease that affects the lives of many around the world; especially those living in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is estimated that about 70% of people suffering with this disease live in this area of the world (Lairson 425). In Botswana, for example, by 2010 the average life expectancy of a new born is expected to be 29 years and the probability of a 15 year old boy dieing from AIDS is over 50% (Lairson 425).

These statistics paint a picture of just how bad AIDS can be for countries incapable of dealing with AIDS. From an economic perspective, the loss of life due to AIDS will be correlated with declining economic activity in a nation. If people are not expected to live past the age of 29, how productive are they going to be? This will lead to a decline in productivity, a decline in national income, and have effects on everything contingent on income.

According to an article in USA Today, President Bush has introduced an initiative to help people suffering with AIDS through government aid to mission groups. Bush believes that “[b]y identifying and supporting these organizations, we will reach more people, more effectively, and save more lives" (USA Today).

Do you think that this is the best way for the US to help in the AIDS pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa? From an economic point of view, is there a better (more efficient) way to cure this disease (or at least stop the spread of it)?

Works Cited
Lairson, Thomas D. and David Skidmore. International Political Economy: The struggle
for Power and Wealth. Third Edition. Wadsworth. Canada, 2003.